View Full Version: SAHARA sequel plans!

Clive Cussler Forum > Movies ... Sahara ; Raise the Titanic > SAHARA sequel plans!



Title: SAHARA sequel plans!


DirkPitt - August 1, 2005 02:00 AM (GMT)
Eisner on the "Sahara" DVD and Sequel Plans

Matthew McConaughey, Penelope Cruz, and Steve Zahn ride camels, blow up boats, and fight off all sorts of bad guys in the action comedy "Sahara," directed by Breck Eisner.

"Sahara" follows master explorer Dirk Pitt (McConaughey) and his sidekick Al (Zahn) as they try and track down a missing Civil War battleship. Their search is interrupted when the two adventurers meet up with the beautiful Dr. Eva Rojas (Cruz) who enlists their help to find out what's killing thousands of people in Africa.

With the release of "Sahara" on DVD set for August 30, 2005, director Breck Eisner took a break between meetings to speak to me about what we can expect from the DVD and the status of a possible sequel:

What are the plans for a sequel? Is there one in the works right now?

“Well, yes, we sure hope to be doing one and I think a lot of that depends on actually how we do on DVD. You know, we’ve done well box office and we want to continue to do well on DVD. And if all things do go well, because it’s an expensive movie, then we will do another one. There are 18 books so we have a lot of source material to pull from.”

Which book would be next?

“I know they have two or three of the books
under contract. But I’m not supposed to tell anyone which ones they are yet, sadly.”

Is the script done?

“No, the script is being written as we speak.”

Have all the stars from “Sahara” signed on to a sequel?

“Yeah. Matthew [McConaughey], Steve Zahn, Bill Macy, and Rainn Wilson are all under three-picture deals.”

And you’ll definitely be directing the sequel?

“Yes, I would love to direct the next one. So if it goes, I’ll be doing it, for sure.”

Will the sequel be the next thing you direct?

“It depends on the timing. I’m taking another movie fairly soon while we finish developing this movie. Hopefully the plan will be I do another movie while we continue writing and developing and scouting this, and I go into the next Sahara after that.”

Tackling “Sahara,” you really had to walk a fine line. You had to satisfy fans of the novels plus make an entertaining movie for people who aren’t familiar with the Clive Cussler books.

“You’re absolutely right. That was a major issue for us. But the biggest challenge is clearly the fact that the book is 700+ pages and the movie is only two hours so it was a real challenge to get as much as we could from the book into the movie. Obviously with that discrepancy of length, there’s no way we could get everything. So, for me, the main focus was to make sure I was true to the characters and to their relationship and to really put the majority of the focus into that relationship and to that dynamic.”

Was there much you couldn’t include that you hated to lose?

“Oh yeah, there were lots of things. One of the openings with Kitty Mannock although it’s on the DVD, it wasn’t on the initial release of the movie. And there were also some elements that were just too expensive that we couldn’t afford, although we spent a lot of money doing it. There were some elements that were just beyond our ability to do in the movie.”

Do you shoot extra content/scenes with bonus content for the DVD in mind?

“Well, when I’m making it, it’s not…. You know, you’re hoping that everything you shoot will be in the movie. But it’s inevitable that by the time you get through cutting, some things are going to disappear. The hope is that they are good scenes that you can include in the DVD itself. But what I was thinking about from the beginning is the behind the scenes type footage.

Actually, we had a woman named Georgia Irwin who was on the film from the beginning of production, of prep; just documenting everything we were doing. That really helped make a much more interesting behind-the-scenes, and a much more intensive, behind-the-scenes documentary.”

Do you find you’re more guarded when there’s someone around specifically shooting behind the scenes footage?

“No. In the beginning you think about it, and then after about five minutes you’ve forgotten that someone’s there with a camera. You’re so focused on getting the movie right that you’ve completely lost any sense of perception of someone watching you.”

Could you have possible chosen more difficult shooting locations?

(Laughing) “It would be difficult to find a more challenging place to shoot. I mean Morocco is an incredible place. I had an amazing time shooting there. The crews and the support were incredible, but it is amazingly remote.

We’re out on the edge of the Sahara Desert, in southern Morocco on the border of Algeria, and it’s a very remote, challenging place and the elements are really intense. And if you need something - if you need a piece of equipment or other support, you’ve got to bring it in. There’s no equipment rental there. There’s no camera servicing there. We had to bring everything with us and all the people and all the equipment, which we trucked in from Europe. So it takes a lot of prep and a lot of planning to make sure you don’t forget something.”

Will the second film be shot in equally challenging locations?

“I’m sure they will be. They’ll be a completely different look. I think it will be more of a jungle than the desert, and more water stuff, but it will be wherever it is. It will certainly be as challenging. And hopefully as exciting for the whole production.”

Do you find it’s a special challenge to direct action sequences?

“I think the secret to directing an action sequence is proper preparation. And obviously you have to start with the vision and the idea of what you want for the action scene. I think a good story being told in the action scene is helpful and good characters - staying true to their characters in the action scene - is important as well.

But the real thing you’ve got to do is you’ve got to be prepared. You have to map out every shot; you have to map out every moment. You really have to know exactly where you want your camera and what you’re going to be shooting because that’s how you’re going to achieve it. And then you break it down bit by bit. If you look at it as a whole and try and tackle it as a whole, it’s completely overwhelming and far too intimidating.”

How do you direct a camel?

“Well, you train it for about three months beforehand and make sure the actors are trained on it beforehand. You know, a camel will only run a hundred yards at a time, three times a day, so it’s a real challenge. We had three matching camels per character and we’d get nine runs out of the camels in the day. If you didn’t get it in those, you were screwed and had to wait for the next day. And they’re mean animals, those things.

All you can do is hope that they’ve been trained well and hope that the actors are comfortable enough on them and give it your all. Penelope [Cruz] had no interest in sitting on the camel when she first got there. And she started getting on it and started walking it and trotting it and by the day before we were shooting, she finally got it up to a gallop. And although she was panicked before starting, by the time she’d gotten used to it, she was thrilled about the idea and she was the best on the camel of any of them. Yeah, she was aggressive.”

Did you have your actors do a lot of their own stunts?

“Yeah. I mean, there were certain types of stunts that would be truly dynamic stunts that stunt doubles had to do. It would have been irresponsible to have them do things like jumping, the actual jump from the camel to the train, or high falls and stuff like that. But everything else these guys did. Matthew, Steve, Penelope, they did their own fight work. They did their own camel racing. The majority of the stunts were done by the actors themselves. Matthew and Steve both drove that boat and trained on driving that boat for about a month before we shot that.”

Back to the DVD release, what can you say about the DVD commentary track?

“Well, we did two commentaries. I did one on my own and then I brought in Matthew [McConaughey] and he and I did one together, which was fun. That was fun to reminiscence with him.”

How does that process work?

“For the first one, for the one I did by myself, I actually watch the film before I go in and make notes about points that I want to talk about. And then I brought my notes with me and immediately forgot to even look at the notes (laughing). It was moving so fast and there were so many stories to tell that I just went through it in the context of what I wanted to talk about most dramatically and dynamically.

With Matthew, it was more about ‘remembering when’ kind of moments and talking about his motivations and really getting Matthew – since I’d done my own commentary - I wanted Matthew to talk a lot about how he devised the character and how he created his character and what research he did and what kind of preparation he did to get ready for the role. And how he went about doing specific scenes and specific moments in the movie.”

Does the studio get involved when you do commentary tracks or are you given free reign?

“We have free reign. I don’t know if they even listen to it! We go into a sound room and we break the movie into two parts, an hour each part, and it just runs. It’s turned on, we can hear ourselves and we can hear the movie, and we just talk away. And I’m sure it goes to legal. I’m sure they have to check that there’s no legal problems, but I’m sure that they never change anything.”

Will there be a blooper reel on the DVD?

“Not a lot of bloopers, per se. The majority of things on the DVD are a few scenes that we didn’t use, one of which was a big airplane crash at the beginning of the movie that got cut out that was pretty dynamic that we completely finished. And a few other scenes with Dirk and Al, a couple comedic scenes. But I didn’t do a blooper reel for the DVD.

You know, it’s so intense, everyone’s so focused because of the danger of everything, there’s a real intensity on the set and there wasn’t a lot of room for too many bloopers. There were some. Believe me, we had blooper moments, but I couldn’t fit it onto the DVD.

It’s funny because by the time you put the movie on - and I wanted to master the movie in the highest quality - and then put the documentary features on which were really great, and then the commentaries and the multiple language tracks and the storyboard comparisons – I had no room left on the DVD.

It is packed full. Every minute, every second they would give me on that is full. I even got Paramount to cut down the amount of trailer time they put in the beginning so they could fit more material on to the DVD.”

A lot of films are released later on with a director’s cut. Will that ever happen with “Sahara?”

“The cut that came out is the director’s cut. I don’t want to or need to change the cut of the movie from the theater to the DVD. The only difference is there are scenes that I took out for length, that are, because I think the movie runs at the right length – I wouldn’t want it to be any longer but the additional scenes – and there are some additional scenes that would have made the movie too long but on their own stand up.”

What’s your opinion, in general, of director’s cuts?

“My hope is that these original cuts don’t get lost and the director’s cuts are supplements to the other cuts. And I think when that’s the case, it’s a great way to see what was in the director’s mind, independent of the studios and the producers and the time constraints of the theaters. I think it has really interesting potential for exploitation on DVD.”

link >>> http://movies.about.com

Mandasy123 - August 1, 2005 02:28 AM (GMT)
This makes me want to buy the DVD even more now...

Giordino13 - August 1, 2005 03:12 AM (GMT)
That was a very interesting read! I wonder what the next mystery movie will be? det:

Captain Nemo - August 1, 2005 03:23 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Giordino13 @ Aug 1 2005, 03:12 AM)
That was a very interesting read! I wonder what the next mystery movie will be? det:

QUOTE
Will the second film be shot in equally challenging locations?

“I’m sure they will be. They’ll be a completely different look. I think it will be more of a jungle than the desert, and more water stuff, but it will be wherever it is. It will certainly be as challenging. And hopefully as exciting for the whole production.”


Water and Jungle?, Sounds to me like Inca Gold snor:

joelstrick - August 1, 2005 03:45 AM (GMT)
I heard they had bought the rights to Inca Gold ? is that right ?

I think Dragon, Treasure or even Flood Tide could be a good film

Foss Gly - August 1, 2005 04:05 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Captain Nemo @ Aug 1 2005, 12:23 AM)
Water and Jungle?, Sounds to me like Inca Gold 

That's what I was thinking, too.
Great information here, all around. As Mandasy mentioned, it makes me look forward to the DVD even more.

(R) - August 1, 2005 04:41 AM (GMT)
Very interesting!

Here is the original press release from May 19, 2001. It says that Crusader Entertainment acquired the rights to "Clive Cussler's best-selling Dirk Pitt® book series".

Since then, the company has reorganized and now is part of Bristol Bay Productions.

Before the SAHARA release, Dave Hyatt at Cusslermen.com dug up this:

QUOTE

Crusader's movie adaptation of Clive Cussler novels is said to include three books initially. They are:

1. Sahara
2. Inca Gold
3. Night Probe!

They want the same actors to play the recurring roles in all three.


Director Breck Eisner obviously confirms that the actors signed a three movie contract, and says it's going to be a lot of jungle and water in the next movie, so it sounds like Inca Gold to me. Good!

46stude - August 1, 2005 05:17 AM (GMT)
Night Probe? I don't see how they'll make a movie about the sale of Canada to the USA in these modern times. Its an awesome book, but the storyline just seems too far-fetched for the general public. I picture a N'Probe movie being "butchered" plot-wise worse than Sahara was (which was still a good movie, but.....).

beer:

Butch 179 - August 1, 2005 07:31 PM (GMT)
<_< I went into the theather KNOWING the movie was not going to be like the book. I enjoyed the film as a film, but do wish it had more of the general feel of the book. A blatant ommision, in my eyes, was the lack of mention that CC was to have script approval. Has anyone heard anything about the pending lawsuit over Sahara? I'll definately get the DVD, but hope the next one won't make DP out to be a treasure hunter.

Ta16uva - August 2, 2005 08:10 PM (GMT)
Well, Im looking very forward to a sequel! I can only hope that this is true and that there will be another! p:

Ta16uva - August 2, 2005 08:17 PM (GMT)
Links are everywhere about this!

To name a few

About.com

ComingSoon.net

mattgarrett - August 5, 2005 11:31 PM (GMT)
JUST ... SAY ... NO!

hopeles117 - August 6, 2005 01:30 AM (GMT)
When I heard they were making the movie, I got pretty stoked. Knowing theyd have to change the story and omit certain parts never excites me, but I feel they did an alright job. The main issues I had were the treasure hunter feel as mentioned above, the uberfast paced feel of it, the approaching-proposterous moments of Dirk and Al's survivability in rough situations, and the fact that they made the "desert-skimmer" building sequence look like it only took them a day to build the thing. That was definitely a "they almost friggin died" situation, but yet, Hollywood (or Morocan?) magic.

Some of my friends who know nothing of the books really just had trouble following the pace, and the unbelievability of some of the situations they survived. I dislike how they didnt really get to know the Dirk Pitt I know Clive Cussler has worked hard to shape for his readership. In Breck's interview above, he mentioned he really kept the scenes to keep the characters true to what he felt they probably were, and yes the relationships, such as with Al, were fairly well rounded and portrayed in ways I approve. But were they Breck's ideas of Dirk's character, or Clives?

Like with the Harry Potter flicks, I wouldnt mind seeing another director try the task of directing one of these. It's not *his* stories to tell, and unless they really let Clive in on the screenwriting, is it gonna continue to be a different Pitt? Im wary, but as a movie lover, I know Ill see them anyway. And as an action enthusiast, Im sure Ill enjoy them as much as I really did enjoy this one (as an action flik). Just hope they let Clive in.

tonym5 - August 6, 2005 06:11 AM (GMT)
Maybe someone a bit older than MM next time? Maybe David Hasselhoff?

Kellym - August 6, 2005 12:47 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (tonym5 @ Aug 6 2005, 07:11 AM)
Maybe someone a bit older than MM next time? Maybe David Hasselhoff?

Please no, I beg you nooooooooooooooooooooo!!!

Ta16uva - August 6, 2005 03:51 PM (GMT)
I'd personally stick with Matthew. He is clearly excited about playing Pitt, and why would we want someone different who wouldn't be as excited and would stay for only one movie?

Dear_Heart05 - August 7, 2005 12:09 AM (GMT)
I TOTALLY agree with you Ta16uva th: . I think MM did an awsome job at Dirk Pitt and am glad that he has signed on. I am equally excited about Steve Zahn and William H. Macy coming back, they were perfect. Anyways, i just wanted to say that. In the mean time, everyone keep your fingers crossed for confirmation on the sequal, I don't want to get my hopes up. :unsure:
w:

starkit000 - August 7, 2005 11:03 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Kellym @ Aug 6 2005, 12:47 PM)
QUOTE (tonym5 @ Aug 6 2005, 07:11 AM)
Maybe someone a bit older than MM next time? Maybe David Hasselhoff?

Please no, I beg you nooooooooooooooooooooo!!!

I totally agree.. no David Hasselhoff please i beg you. :unsure:

Please let Inca Gold be next

Dear_Heart05 - August 9, 2005 02:05 AM (GMT)
HAHA :lol: , i have to agree with starkit000 on that one.

sdaniel_lca - August 10, 2005 07:53 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Dear_Heart05 @ Aug 7 2005, 12:09 AM)
I TOTALLY agree with you Ta16uva th: . I think MM did an awsome job at Dirk Pitt and am glad that he has signed on. I am equally excited about Steve Zahn and William H. Macy coming back, they were perfect. Anyways, i just wanted to say that. In the mean time, everyone keep your fingers crossed for confirmation on the sequal, I don't want to get my hopes up. :unsure:
w:

I was a little worried about MM also. But he's just so hot, I easily adapted to the idea. I can't wait to see another one. I wish they would get more into Dirk & Al's characters. Gotta love CC!!! co:

Dear_Heart05 - August 20, 2005 12:13 AM (GMT)
Has there been anymore news on plans for the sequal??? The waiting is killing me!!! .......Anyone? :unsure:

Ta16uva - August 20, 2005 12:24 AM (GMT)
Been looking but so far I havent found anything new <_<

ranger8668 - August 20, 2005 11:03 AM (GMT)
I think Sahara was such a POS they shouold just drop it all and let us imagine what is happening. Esp. if Breck Esner if directing and its the same writers. There has to be somebody out there would direct and write this. Sahara did well enough to entice bigger and betterr names.

mattgarrett - August 29, 2005 11:25 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (ranger8668 @ Aug 20 2005, 11:03 AM)
I think Sahara was such a POS they shouold just drop it all and let us imagine what is happening. Esp. if Breck Esner if directing and its the same writers. There has to be somebody out there would direct and write this. Sahara did well enough to entice bigger and betterr names.

"We're not going to stop until we've changed the premise of every book."
- MG as MM

j2pphillips - September 1, 2005 07:39 AM (GMT)
Been Awhile since I Posted!!


Ok my wonderful wife bought the DVD for me on Tuesday, I have too say I enjoyed the movie, I tried not too feel disapointed not seeing the Abe Linclon plot and not seeing Kitty Mannock plot either.
But it didn't seem to matter, MM & S.Zahn played Dirk & Al very well and I felt they were buddies from kindergarden.
I thought William H. Macy as Sandecker was not bad, though I feel if there is a sequel, his character needs a bit strengthing up.
And even though at the beginning of the movie, Ididn't like NUMA seen as a salvage company - at the end of the movie it seems like they will move into Clive's Verson.(Thank God)
There were some nice touches right when the opening credits were going.
(A newspaper of the Titanic)

Out of ten I give it a 7.


Now the Sequel - I hope we get too see Dirk's place - i.e Airport Hanger and we see other things that will let us know that they do care what Clive's Vision is all about.

So Yes I want too See a SEQUEL!!


congrejo - September 21, 2005 04:30 PM (GMT)
Nothing to see here, moving on.

tonym5 - September 21, 2005 04:45 PM (GMT)
If they ever think about it, they could add a mention of Kitty Mannock by Dirk and have a pic of her in a new DVD version and since we're at it, maybe add a mention that Lincoln was kidnapped. p:

13thMonkey - September 25, 2005 11:24 PM (GMT)
I just finished watching most of this movie with commentary on.

They definetely hint at a strong possibility of a sequel. They mention "franchise" and "see you on the next adventure"....

(they being MM and Mr Director).

The commentary mention a lot about CC involvement in the project. No sign of ill feelings between any of them.




CusslerFanatic - November 10, 2005 11:30 PM (GMT)
t: I want Night Probe and Inca Gold made as well. Night Probe is my favorite book. But please if they do them they need to stick closer to the books story line. Make Al and Dirk Air Force not Navy and please please please make Rudi the hard nosed guy he is the books and not some bumbling spineless geek they made him in Sahara th:

sharkluver22 - November 11, 2005 03:24 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (CusslerFanatic @ Nov 10 2005, 11:30 PM)
Make Al and Dirk Air Force not Navy and please please please make Rudi the hard nosed guy he is the books and not some bumbling spineless geek they made him in Sahara th:

I agree soooo much!

Foss Gly - November 11, 2005 04:42 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (CusslerFanatic @ Nov 10 2005, 07:30 PM)
t: I want Night Probe and Inca Gold made as well.  Night Probe is my favorite book.  But please if they do them they need to stick closer to the books story line. Make Al and Dirk Air Force not Navy and please please please make Rudi the hard nosed guy he is the books and not some bumbling spineless geek they made him in Sahara th:

As much as we'd like to see them stick to the storyline, there's NO WAY the changes you've suggested will happen. :( It's sad but true.

The reason is simple enough...they've established certain things that will now be considered movie 'canon', things that simply must stay the same though one movie and on to another. For instance, Rudi. As much as all of us might like to see the "real deal" we've gotten to know and love in the novels, he's not going to change on-screen. The first movie established who he is and how he acts. They simply can't, in the nexty movie, have him be "our" Rudi, because audences tuning in to the sequel would be confused.
What was shown on screen has become the standard to which all subsequent movies in the franchise must now follow. That's not to say they cannot introduce new things, (they certainly can and likely will), but anything that was in the first movie pretty much will have to stay reasonably the same in any more.

Now, if a different actor comes into the role, which is unlikely due to the contracts I'm sure, this may be somewhat different, When someone isn't as easily recognized from before, they can sort of make thw role their own. But that's another whole can of worms!
:lol:

rockbank - November 21, 2005 03:36 AM (GMT)
Its been suggested on some threads that Michael Caine takes on the role of Brian Shaw for the Night Probe film.

Sean Connery is too old, too reluctant and probably too expensive.

But then Michael Caine isn't in the greatest of shape either.

For me I'd love to see George Lazenby as Brian Shaw. He starred in the best Bond flick, "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" and he's still in pretty good shape bearing in mind that a lot of stuntwork would be involved.

He gave an excellent performance as Jarod's father in The Pretender including a lot of running around and fist fights and you could believe that he could give Matthew McConaughey's Dirk Pitt a run for his money.

Fire - November 26, 2005 04:18 PM (GMT)
I'd go for Robert Duval as Brian Shaw he's a good figther

bnmjeff - November 26, 2005 11:36 PM (GMT)
George Lazenby??? You are kidding, right? He had to be the WORST Bond ever, and sadly he was in one of the better Bond Movies. Connery wouldn't be to old as Brian Shaw. Shaw really didin't have a lot of stunts either, just a swing or two with Mr. Gly! As much as I would love to see Night Probe made into a movie, I would hate to see how they would butcher the story to make it fit the movie formula.

Jeff

rockbank - November 27, 2005 04:41 PM (GMT)

oswalder - November 27, 2005 10:48 PM (GMT)
Wasn't the idea that Shaw is retired? I think it would be weird if someone were to play him but weren't at retirement age. :blink: ;)

brocktoon75 - February 21, 2006 03:15 PM (GMT)
Watched Sahara again this weekend, and it is better the second time around, IMHO.

did not watch the extra stuff, since I have not yet read the book. I read 8 Cusslers last year, I had to take a break. I will start up again shortly.

The last two I read were phenominal. Deep Six and Cyclops. And yes, Night Probe would be a GREAT movie!

blackjack - February 22, 2006 03:12 AM (GMT)
How bout harrison ford as Shaw? He is a pretty big name, but it would draw more movie goers as long as he didnt show up MM. He faked a decent scottish accent in The Last Crusade, and he is getting pretty old as well.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree