Title: I'm on a roll!
andyhuff - March 20, 2006 07:21 PM (GMT)
Okay, so its not original art, but still pretty freakin' cool:
I never can understand why European movie artwork turns out so much cooler than the U.S. ;)
andy
I never can understand why European movie artwork turns out so much cooler than the U.S. ;)
andy
justreeve - April 11, 2006 07:29 AM (GMT)
You're right, that poster is so cool.
I like the original (which we also got in the UK), but this one is more 'dramatic' and has that touch of "Raiders..." about it.
I always thought that Paramount never promoted the movie as strongly as they should have done - maybe they thought if they lost money then they wouldn't have to give as much to Clive??!!
I like the original (which we also got in the UK), but this one is more 'dramatic' and has that touch of "Raiders..." about it.
I always thought that Paramount never promoted the movie as strongly as they should have done - maybe they thought if they lost money then they wouldn't have to give as much to Clive??!!
loren1 - April 11, 2006 03:06 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (justreeve @ Apr 11 2006, 03:29 AM) |
| You're right, that poster is so cool. I like the original (which we also got in the UK), but this one is more 'dramatic' and has that touch of "Raiders..." about it. I always thought that Paramount never promoted the movie as strongly as they should have done - maybe they thought if they lost money then they wouldn't have to give as much to Clive??!! |
You could be right th:
andyhuff - April 11, 2006 05:07 PM (GMT)
I know this is the fan art forum and this discussion is better suited for the Movies forum, but you might be on to something. I've always believed Sahara would have scored bigger at the box office had it been promoted successfully. Word of mouth has carried it as far as it has come. My parents saw it a couple of weeks ago and loved it!
- andy
- andy