View Full Version: Date for legal action over epilepsy medication

Vns Message Board > Medical Warnings > Date for legal action over epilepsy medication


Title: Date for legal action over epilepsy medication
Description: The unwanted effects of Medication?


pip - July 24, 2006 04:16 PM (GMT)
Hi.

What shouldn't happen is this sort of thing. Not in this day and age anyway. Sad but true this has, and these people are seeking answers. They have children they want the best for. That has to include advice and info on what their children will need.

They may also want a place to come, to talk share, and if they do?

I hope they find the understanding, support and friendship I did when I first met many of the posters on this board. Especially the head cheese of the outfit( smile) with her wicked sense of humour, and who has Mothers in mind.

pip

Date for legal action over epilepsy medication

The High Court has set a date for the action brought against a drug manufacturer by parents who claim an anti-epileptic drug prescribed to pregnant mothers caused disabilities in their children.

Group action by solicitors, Irwin Mitchell, is being brought against Sanofi-Synthelabo which markets sodium valporate as Epilim.

A trial date has been set for October 2008. The cut-off date for families to register as claimants for compensation has been set for March next year, but claims must be registered with Irwin Mitchell by 1 October 2006 to allow proper investigation of each case.

Families from all over the UK claim that the drug caused problems including ADHD, facial abnormalities, vision defects, dyslexia, dyspraxia, delayed speech and motor development, and learning and social difficulties.

Deborah Mann believes her daughters were injured before birth when she took the prescription drug to control epileptic seizures. “While we do everything we can to ensure the girls have the care and equipment they need, it is expensive and we feel strongly that the company whose products caused these problems should face its responsibilities and meet the extra costs we face.”

The campaign is being co-ordinated by OACS (Organisation for Anti-Convulsant Syndrome), formed by Janet Williams. She said,"We want to hear from any family where the mother took this anti-epileptic drug in pregnancy and where a child has had foetal anti-convulsant syndrome diagnosed or suffers from a range of neural, behavioural and physical disorders.

"We are not saying the drug doesn't work to control seizures, because it does, but we are saying that one side effect is foetal damage during pregnancy and we believe Sanofi should foot the bill for the cost of care that children damaged by the drug require."

In earlier comments Sanofi-Synthelabo said, “Anti-epileptic drugs are crucial to the health of those prescribed them and have passed stringent medical tests. Sanofi-Synthelabo Ltd has every sympathy for people born with congenital abnormality, and would advise women with epilepsy who may become pregnant to speak to their doctor."

Epilepsy Action's Mothers in mind campaign

Bernard - August 8, 2006 12:55 PM (GMT)
20% !!!! :shock:

QUOTE ("L.A. Times")
One in five women who took the widely used epilepsy drug valproate in a clinical trial had pregnancies resulting in birth defects or fetal death, researchers said Monday.

The drug, sold as Depakote by Abbott Laboratories Inc., was substantially riskier to unborn children than three competing medicines examined in the study. The researchers found cases of malformed hearts and genitals, cleft palate and artery deformities among children born to women taking the drug.

The report in the journal Neurology was the latest to document the potential dangers of valproate to fetuses. The drug is also used to treat headaches and some psychiatric conditions, including bipolar disorder.

...

The researchers, led by Dr. Kimford J. Meador of the University of Florida in Gainesville studied 333 pregnant women at 25 centers in the U.S. and England.

The women had been taking one of four drugs — valproate, carbamazepine, phenytoin or lamotrigine — when they became pregnant and continued use during their pregnancy.

Twenty percent, or 14, of the 69 women on valproate had pregnancies that resulted in fetal deaths or birth defects.

For phenytoin, which is sold as Dilantin, six of 56 women, or 11%, had pregnancies ending in fetal death or congenital malformations.

Nine of the 110 women who took carbamazepine (Tegretol), or 8%, had pregnancies that ended in fetal death or birth defects. The rate for lamotrigine (Lamictal), was 1% — one of 98 women on the drug.

Meador said the results showed that valproate should not be the drug of first choice for women of childbearing age.

But he added that it was less clear what the alternative should be.

He was reluctant to declare Lamictal the safest drug of the four because other studies had found a higher rate of birth defects associated with its use.



Hosted for free by InvisionFree