Title: FDA Asks U.S. Marshals to Seize Dietary Supplement
Description: Products Being Promoted With Drug Claims
Birdbomb - September 8, 2006 08:56 AM (GMT)
FDA News
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
P06-128
September 6, 2006
Media Inquiries:
Catherine McDermott, 301-827-6242
Consumer Inquiries:
888-INFO-FDA
FDA Asks U.S. Marshals to Seize Dietary Supplements
Products Being Promoted With Drug Claims
At the request of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), on September 5, 2006, U.S. Marshals seized quantities of Ellagimax capsules, Coral Max capsules, Coral Max without Iron capsules, and Advanced Arthritis Support capsules distributed by Advantage Nutraceuticals L.L.C. of Fort Walton Beach, Florida, valued at approximately $55,000.00.
The products are alleged to be in violation of the new drug and misbranding provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
Although these products are labeled as "dietary supplements," they are being promoted with claims typically associated with drug products. These claims are evident in the products' labeling, including various promotional literature, an audio cassette tape, and two Internet Web sites owned and used by the firm. We advise consumers to consult with their physician if they are taking these products.
Advantage Nutraceuticals' labeling promotes and markets these products for serious disease conditions, including but not limited to cancer, arthritis, fibromyalgia and seizures.
FDA considers these products to be unapproved new drugs, and the agency takes seriously its responsibility to protect Americans from dangerous unapproved drugs. Before a new drug product may be legally marketed, it must be shown to be safe and effective and approved by FDA. Drug product labeling must also include adequate directions for use, which the seized products' labeling does not provide.
Following an investigation of the firm's marketing practices, FDA advised Advantage Nutraceuticals that the claims related to prevention or treatment of diseases in many of its products' labeling make these products subject to regulation as drugs. Despite FDA's warnings, the firm failed to take sufficient steps to come into compliance with the Act. During subsequent inspections, FDA inspectors found that the offending claims were still being made.
Source