View Full Version: Sign here if you're active.

Fire Emblem Wars > Updates > Sign here if you're active.

Pages: [1] 2


Title: Sign here if you're active.


Pondy - April 20, 2008 05:35 PM (GMT)
If you've actually been active on FEW in recent months, post here saying so and about how much time you've got to be able to dedicate to the forum if it were to be active again.

This isn't necessarily an attempt at a reset or anything like that. I just want to know who all has been here, and if there are enough...well, we'll take it from there.

LoZfan03 - April 20, 2008 05:42 PM (GMT)
woot, first signage!! *signs*

how fast I responded should give you some indicator...I've got more than enough time if things go as fast as they did 2-3 resets ago. in fact, judging would give me something to do...

Arcan - April 20, 2008 05:57 PM (GMT)
What he said xD.

While I'm not extremely active per se, I do manage to check to forum 5~6 times per day, and if it becomes active again, I should be able to devote time, although I will have a job here soon.

Valter - April 20, 2008 06:37 PM (GMT)
I've been on pretty much every day. I have plenty of time to dedicate to the forum, but I want to know what we're dedicating to.

UnrealBlight - April 20, 2008 07:02 PM (GMT)
Hola.

Not sure if id say active now, but dedicated. Grounded from computer for now,using PSP. Ill do anything to help as soon as I can.

Kaden - April 20, 2008 09:08 PM (GMT)
I'm still 'round. School's kinda crazy, and I'm spending a lot of time doing things other than the internet now, so... :unsure: Still though, I guess I'm... signing(???) this... Active enough.

Ultima - April 21, 2008 12:20 AM (GMT)
I have my own laptop. I'm home a lot. I stay up until about 5 in the morning every morning. I'm here a decent bit :P

SeverIan. - April 21, 2008 12:58 AM (GMT)
I wouldn't be active in the RPG but I might go ahead and judge (maybe 5-10 matches a day). I'd also randomly offer unneeded input on any discussions of any new mechanics, rules, whatever.

Kipdog - April 21, 2008 04:02 AM (GMT)
I didnt notice this topic yesterday...

Anyways, yeah, I am active. I check the site atleast once a day on average. Nothing is going on though so it doesnt warrant my time at the moment.

Karn - April 21, 2008 05:01 AM (GMT)
I check the forums a few times per day when I check smashboards and whatnot.

Ursula - April 21, 2008 08:18 PM (GMT)
I check about every day. Not that much active though.

sara13987 - April 22, 2008 01:19 AM (GMT)
Honestly, I check as often as I can. That can translate to every day or once every week or two. I'm really sorry. I love you guys and all, but I'm just so busy... :/

KuraiKitsune - April 22, 2008 02:54 AM (GMT)
I consider myself a professional lurker. :lol: I could come back, but only if it's a total upheaval of the comatose state this board is going through. :P

I've been stopping by once every few days or so since my birthday (I know, I know, selfish. But it's true, and I won't deny it.), but that can always change.

In other words: Am I active? No. Can I be? Sure, why not. ^_^

SeverIan. - April 22, 2008 05:12 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (KuraiKitsune @ Apr 21 2008, 09:54 PM)
I consider myself a professional lurker. :lol: I could come back, but only if it's a total upheaval of the comatose state this board is going through. :P

Considering your professional lurking abilities, I have decided to officially promote you to active user. Now you have to make 3 posts in one of the general chat threads by 11:59 PM EST on April 22nd. Nevermind that I have no official power.

The same goes for Ultima.

Now exercise the power to change the future gifted to all members of the human race. WERE YOU ACTIVE? NO! ARE YOU ACTIVE NOW! TONIGHT WE DINE IN HELL!

Lades - April 22, 2008 04:33 PM (GMT)
With Sevvy still ranting his hoboish wisdom, I'm not going anywhere anytime soon. Sides, it's cozy here.

I'm here quite a bit, even if I don't post much, but I can't do anything really til after next monday.

Reydemagival20635 - April 23, 2008 07:06 PM (GMT)
Yeah, I've been lurking myself, posting here and there... no real problems to moderate, what with Aien and Hiei being banned... (Best decision ever...) But yeah, Pondz, you know I'm always around. I do have school, and soon work, but that's irrelevant.

Karn - April 23, 2008 07:43 PM (GMT)
I did not know they were both banned.

Reydemagival20635 - April 23, 2008 07:48 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Karn @ Apr 23 2008, 03:43 PM)
I did not know they were both banned.

Yeah, I moved for 'em both to stay gone. Aien went first, then we all collectively got sick of Hiei, so he went too... it's why our banner's different. But yeah, you may have noticed there's been such little animosity.

SeverIan. - April 24, 2008 05:07 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Reydemagival20635 @ Apr 23 2008, 02:48 PM)
QUOTE (Karn @ Apr 23 2008, 03:43 PM)
I did not know they were both banned.

Yeah, I moved for 'em both to stay gone. Aien went first, then we all collectively got sick of Hiei, so he went too... it's why our banner's different. But yeah, you may have noticed there's been such little animosity.

THAT'S WHERE ALL THE FUN IS!!

Ah w/e. Doesn't matter.

Karn - April 24, 2008 07:03 PM (GMT)
I thought the low level of animosity was due to the low level of activity.

LoZfan03 - April 24, 2008 07:28 PM (GMT)
oh man, are we going to have an argument about animosity? :XD

Kipdog - April 24, 2008 10:51 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (LoZfan03 @ Apr 24 2008, 02:28 PM)
oh man, are we going to have an argument about animosity? :XD

If we would, it would disprove Karn's theory about low level of animosity was due to the low level of activity.

LoZfan03 - April 24, 2008 11:12 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Kipdog @ Apr 24 2008, 05:51 PM)
QUOTE (LoZfan03 @ Apr 24 2008, 02:28 PM)
oh man, are we going to have an argument about animosity?  :XD

If we would, it would disprove Karn's theory about low level of animosity was due to the low level of activity.

or it would cause an increase of activity, thereby supporting his theory :unsure:

Kipdog - April 25, 2008 01:41 AM (GMT)
You have a valid point, but I will choose to ignore it. >_>

strike - April 25, 2008 02:07 AM (GMT)
I'm here, although I shouldn't be. I'm stresses as fuck with schoolwork. Three AP tests coming up in like two weeks. Agh.

I appear once here and there. That's about it. I can be somewhat active. Active enough for the return of Strikey of Bern? DOn't count on it. :P

PLUS I HAVEN'T GOTTEN TO PLAY RADIANT DAWN. :(

SeverIan. - April 25, 2008 02:36 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Karn @ Apr 24 2008, 02:03 PM)
I thought the low level of animosity was due to the low level of activity.

And the low level of RPG judging which SPREADS INEQUITY EVERYWHERE, CREATES CLASS DIFFERENCES (economic in the form of gold, social in the form of promotions) AND SPARKS ADVERSITY AND SUCH AND IS COUNTERREVOLUTIONARY
QUOTE

PLUS I HAVEN'T GOTTEN TO PLAY RADIANT DAWN. sad.gif

I have it but I haven't finished yet (don't spend much time playing 1 player games).

Arcan - April 25, 2008 08:17 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (SeverIan. @ Apr 24 2008, 10:36 PM)
And the low level of RPG judging which SPREADS INEQUITY EVERYWHERE, CREATES CLASS DIFFERENCES (economic in the form of gold, social in the form of promotions) AND SPARKS ADVERSITY AND SUCH AND IS COUNTERREVOLUTIONARY

I wonder if one possible solution to that is a judging bot...

LoZfan03 - April 25, 2008 09:26 PM (GMT)
that'd be sick and cool at the same time.

as it is though, I'd be able to whip up a java app in no time to do the actual judging, meaning up to 3-4 a minute, I'd guess. I'd use my visual basic one from a year and a half ago, but it got lost with my beloved zip drive along with all of my sprite shop that wasn't photobucketed. it's too bad, really, I had just finally worked out the last bug too >_<

Reydemagival20635 - April 26, 2008 01:11 AM (GMT)
We've had more than a few Judging programs whipped up in our time... the problem is incorporating them into the system. It generally doesn't translate too well, unless we can set up a seperate site for it, with battle logs and all that jazz.

nightwalker - April 26, 2008 02:34 AM (GMT)
I'm kind of sort of active. I go here once a day, but post only a few times a week.

UnrealBlight - April 26, 2008 04:49 AM (GMT)
If we can get it back around the time I get my comp back, Ill stay out for a reset and personally use my usual judging prowess.

As for now, sleeping in every class ain't helping me none.

SeverIan. - April 26, 2008 09:05 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Karn @ Apr 24 2008, 02:03 PM)
I thought the low level of animosity was due to the low level of activity.

BTW it could be the other way around; more animosity, more activity. This is why I am CHALLENGING THE STATUS QUO CONSISTENTLY IN MY POSTS

Trace Stratus - April 27, 2008 05:50 PM (GMT)
I'm active. I just haven't been posting lately. :/

Karn - April 27, 2008 09:34 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (SeverIan. @ Apr 26 2008, 04:05 PM)
QUOTE (Karn @ Apr 24 2008, 02:03 PM)
I thought the low level of animosity was due to the low level of activity.

BTW it could be the other way around; more animosity, more activity. This is why I am CHALLENGING THE STATUS QUO CONSISTENTLY IN MY POSTS

GOOD SHIT SON!

Puff - April 28, 2008 01:56 AM (GMT)
Not so active because of school crap, but I haven't forgotten...

'Ivan - May 5, 2008 04:59 AM (GMT)
Look up my occupation member title on 'Kipedia. :o

Durendal - May 5, 2008 07:59 PM (GMT)
I would definately have to consider returning on a more regular basis if people would only post! So I guess you could say I would be active. (Oh and I agree with whoever said that animosity would increase traffic. If theres anyone who wants to start an online arguement with me I'm more than ready :D)

Kipdog - May 5, 2008 08:00 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Durendal @ May 5 2008, 02:59 PM)
I would definately have to consider returning on a more regular basis if people would only post! So I guess you could say I would be active. (Oh and I agree with whoever said that animosity would increase traffic. If theres anyone who wants to start an online arguement with me I'm more than ready :D)

Lets go. Right now. I'll start off with pointing out how you incorrectly spelled Durandal.

Durendal - May 5, 2008 08:33 PM (GMT)
Durandal - The sword in the stupid game

Durendal - A character from Dave Duncan's novel The Gilded Chain, A swordfighter trained from the age of 12 or 13 in the art of swordplay.

And you bolded the wrong letter dude, seriously wtf take this seriously.

Kipdog - May 5, 2008 09:50 PM (GMT)
You know what?


Owned.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree