I know a decent amount of you don't live in America, but you probably know enough about it to understand what the hell I'm talking about. I just needed to get this rant out of my system.
First of all, what the hell's this crap with the flag-burning amendment? (A brief recap: there's a high chance that the House, Senate, and all those other dolts are going to pass an amendment to the United States constitution making it a crime to burn the American flag.)
Look, I'm Chinese, but I'm not a commie; I've lived in the US since I was one and I'm probably a lot more patriotic than a lot of people you know (almost to the point of nationalism, in fact, but that's not such a bad thing).
However, all these bloody idiots who are passing this goddamn bill are so bloody dumb they can't see the forest for the trees. The tree represents the forest; the flag represents America. But the bloody flag doesn't epitomize the values of America, and one of those values is freedom of speech and the right to protest in whatever way you want. I'm not saying burning the flag is a
good thing to do; I'm just saying that it's something we have a right to do if for some inexplicable reason we ever want to. In all practicality, this isn't even a big problem - it's not like you walk out on the street and are instantly accosted by angry crowds waving around flaming flags. And now the stupid politicans are wasting their time passing this bill.
The crappy thing is that
no one is going to vote against the <blocked>ing thing. If they do, they'll instantly by slammed be the idiots who have no perspective and don't realize that they're actually doing good by voting against it. If you know me at all, you'll know I'm quite conservative and know that I'm not attacking it just because I like burning flags or anything; it simply violates a basic right given forth in the Constitution.
All right. That's the first point.
The second point concerns a Supreme Court decision that I personally think is even more undermining and stupid than the amendment. It's talked about in the Washington Post
here, but for those of you who don't want to read that, the ruling is basically that local governments are allowed to
force private property owners to sell their land to the government, even if there isn't anything wrong with it.
What the <blocked> is wrong with people these days?
This ruling is bloody socialism, not democracy!
Farmer Dan: "Oh, hello, Governor Bill! How're you doing!"
Governor Bill: "Oh, excellent, Farmer Dan. How about you?"
Farmer Dan: "Great, great. Crop's just coming in, so time for harvest, huh? I can spare a few melons for you if you want 'em."
Governor Bill: "Ah, about your farm..."
Farmer Dan: "Yes?"
Governor Bill: "Well, we've decided that it would be most beneficial to the economy if there was actually a four story hotel on that land instead. So we're buying it from you."
Farmer Dan: "W-what?! You can't just-"
Governor Bill: "Too bad. Supreme Court's on our side. And hey, guess what? The local government gets to decide how much your property is worth! Hmm, how much do I got on me... eh, ten bucks. All right, I say your property is worth ten bucks."
He shoves the bills into a horrified Farmer Dan
's hand. "Ayep, your land now officially belongs to the government now. Oh, and about those melons. I wouldn't mind a pumpkin or two, think you could spare some?"
(Obviously hyperbole, but you get the bloody point, don't you?)
Wait, hold on - here's a bit of comparison.
Dictionary.com's
definition of socialism: "Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by
a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy."
The Washington Post article: "The Supreme Court ruled yesterday that local governments
may force property owners to sell out and make way for private economic development when officials decide it would benefit the public, even if the property is not blighted and the new project's success is not guaranteed."
SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM! IF I WANTED SOCIALISM I WOULD BLOODY HELL MOVE BACK TO CHINA! GRAAAR!
... you know, it's times like these when I wonder Axem Titanium might be on to something after all with his claims of American decadence.
... oh, actually, I have a third issue. I was listening to the radio, and supposedly practically nobody wants their kids to join the military anymore. I think that's just bloody cowardly. A caller who worked as an army recruiter phoned in and said that before September 11th, his office phones were ringing off the hook; September 12th, his office was silent as the grave.
How bloody ridiculous is that? You'd happily join the army when there's no war, but when you actually have the fight - the whole bloody point of an
army - nobody signs up. On December 8th, 1941, the lines were packed with people wanting to get at the "Japs". People were
lying about their age to get into the military, for Christ's sake. We're so bloody decadent now we're not even willing to fight for the country anymore.
... oh yeah. Another issue. You might have heard about this, but Chinese companies have been attempting to make rather big acquisitions in the U.S. economy of late, including takeovers of Maytag and UNOCAL, a Texas-based gas company.
These events brought to my attention that (1) even if China invaded in the traditional way, the good ol' American willingness to take up arms has apparently died, and (2) China doesn't even need to invade to wreck the U.S.
You see, not only do many American companies depend on Chinese labor, China owns a ridiculous amount of American treasury bonds (at least according to my father, who's a former banker and economist as well as a current investor, making him, at least in my eyes, a quite reputable source).
Treasury bonds work like this. When the government needs money, they sell bonds to the population. The money from the sale goes to the government, and the bond goes to the purchaser. After a while, the purchaser can redeem them for their initial investment plus interest. They're essentially government I.O.U.'s.
So the problem with China owning all those bonds is that despite the liquidity of the bond market, China owns so bloody many (again, this is from my father; I haven't had time to confirm it yet) that if they were to sell them all they would create a ridiculous rise in supply. Well, the supply and demand principle is obvious: the supply goes up while the demand stays the same, and the price just goes down the drain. So here you get all these people buying cheap U.S. bonds that in all likelihood have already matured. What are they going to do with them, just frame them and stick 'em on a wall? No, they'll cash them in. Basically, not only would the Treasury get a bleedin' ridiculous number of people trying to cash in bonds, they would also sell much less than normal because people wouldn't need to buy the bonds from them if they could buy it cheap from the Chinese.
... now, I'm not an economist even though both my parents are and I suppose it's in my blood, so it's perfectly possible that this last rant (which is mostly conjecture founded by only a small bit of research) is unlikely. Still, the economic power of China is not easily pushed aside. These days, brute force is not the way to solve things; diplomacy and economics are the statesman's new weapons of choice.
Okay, that's all for today. My wrist hurts like hell. I can't belive I wrote all that in half an hour... oh well. It's nice to get it off my mind. I bet ninety percent of the people who open this topic will take a look at this amazingly long rant and go away. If you get this far, I applaud you.