Pages: (4) [1] 2 3 ... Last » ( Go to first unread post )

 Fuel Economy, how do we improve it?
chucker
  Posted: Oct 26 2004, 10:47 AM


Stock


Group: Std. Member
Posts: 68
Member No.: 106
Joined: 8-October 04



I was wondering..
wot should we use for best performance and economy..
wots the recommended for Altezza? 96 or 98 octane?

I'm not concerned about the price.. only k's per ltr..
how do we improve it?

well, I hope we should start with a stock standard engine.. biggrin.gif
FLEX
Posted: Oct 26 2004, 11:53 AM


Sleeper


Group: Moderators
Posts: 1,585
Member No.: 34
Joined: 10-August 04



I used to use BP Ultimate (98 octane) and that was pretty dam good ! I used to always get around 620-640kms from a full tank easy.
Ever since I had my engine flush, cleaned and service with all the filters replaced and all - I was advise to do a switch over to Shell Optimax ...

I only get around 580kms now ...
"Supposely" Shell is better ...

try and use the one brand of fuel if possible ... with the price nowadays - up to $1.20 its crazy .... !


--------------------
user posted image
Stephen
  Posted: Oct 26 2004, 02:22 PM


Altezza Club of Australia TRD Parts & Accessories


Group: Director
Posts: 3,867
Member No.: 35
Joined: 10-August 04



Likewise, I only use Shell Optimax.


--------------------
user posted image
bmalar
Posted: Oct 26 2004, 03:21 PM


Location: Brisbane, AU


Group: VIP Member
Posts: 767
Member No.: 73
Joined: 2-September 04



I also only use only Optimax, but if i get desperate I'll use BP ultimate.


--------------------
Brisbane

2005 IS250 Sports Lux
&
2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600 K5
Flyboy69
Posted: Oct 26 2004, 05:36 PM


"Gold Club" Member


Group: VIP Member
Posts: 588
Member No.: 45
Joined: 14-August 04



Try running around with my Diff and see what sort of fuel usage you get. I wish I was getting 580km out of a tank. I proberly average about 480-500km. Over here 98 is about $1.28 at the moment


--------------------
user posted image
voiceinsideyou
Posted: Oct 26 2004, 07:23 PM


Stock


Group: VIP Member
Posts: 153
Member No.: 22
Joined: 6-August 04



Of course, comparing GXE10s to SXE10s will be useless - so it'd help if people made clear what they have!

I'd be lucky to get 500kms from my SXE10 with intake only mods, but I'm happy enough :-p


--------------------
99 Altezza RS200Z: C-west front kit, xenon conve, HKS intake + Apexi heatshield, FGK/Fujitsubo exhaust, TRD front and rear sways, Cusco adjustble platform suspension
chucker
  Posted: Oct 26 2004, 11:56 PM


Stock


Group: Std. Member
Posts: 68
Member No.: 106
Joined: 8-October 04



oops.. my bad..
I think we should state that too..

as I read somewhere, recommended fuel for
  • GXE-10 is Unleaded Regular
and
  • SXE-10 is Unleaded Premium

I've got SXE-10 and it does about 9kms/ltr [avg urban]..
its a '99 (model) and its a stock standard as far as I know wink.gif
so, I think the fuel economy is pretty bad for me..

actually, I've tried both 96 and 98 octane..
98 is pretty much give you more performance for less k's.. (like high 8s a ltr)
and 96 is pretty good with more k's (low - mid 9s a ltr)..
RS200AT
Posted: Oct 27 2004, 08:10 PM


Lowered


Group: Std. Member
Posts: 248
Member No.: 94
Joined: 26-September 04



GXE-10 have 10L larger tank capacity.

I can get 10km/L in mt RS200, but 9-9.5 is more common.
Twincams
Posted: Oct 28 2004, 05:21 AM


Stock


Group: Std. Member
Posts: 110
Member No.: 96
Joined: 27-September 04



my RS200 is getting close to 11km/l...

i personally noted that using 98 and below fetches worse mileage than the 'claimed 100' octane by Caltex(it's called Platinum grade here in singapore) which i am using now for good.


--------------------
user posted image
chucker
Posted: Oct 28 2004, 08:27 AM


Stock


Group: Std. Member
Posts: 68
Member No.: 106
Joined: 8-October 04



QUOTE (Twincams @ Oct 28 2004, 05:21 AM)
i personally noted that using 98 and below fetches worse mileage than the 'claimed 100' octane by Caltex(it's called Platinum grade here in singapore) which i am using now for good.

we dont get 100 octane in NZ gas stations yet tongue.gif

anyway,
I think the main thing is that I've gotta reset my ECU.
Then, I've gotta start using a single type of gas..

so, at least I can get 9.5kms per ltr.. cool.gif
Alee79
Posted: Oct 28 2004, 02:50 PM


Location: Sydney, AU


Group: Std. Member
Posts: 407
Member No.: 109
Joined: 14-October 04



100 octane? for real?
i use vortex from caltex all the time,because petrol card from work tongue.gif
cant complain laugh.gif


--------------------
2000 IS200 Silver
user posted image
chucker
  Posted: Oct 28 2004, 03:58 PM


Stock


Group: Std. Member
Posts: 68
Member No.: 106
Joined: 8-October 04



good for you man biggrin.gif

wots the consumption for your IS200? is it sports model?
Alee79
Posted: Oct 28 2004, 04:42 PM


Location: Sydney, AU


Group: Std. Member
Posts: 407
Member No.: 109
Joined: 14-October 04



QUOTE (chucker @ Oct 28 2004, 03:58 PM)
good for you man biggrin.gif

wots the consumption for your IS200? is it sports model?

2000 IS200 Sport,70 litres tank,i cant remember whats the fuel consumption on it..maybe some of our expert here can tell us tongue.gif


--------------------
2000 IS200 Silver
user posted image
Twincams
Posted: Oct 29 2004, 05:53 AM


Stock


Group: Std. Member
Posts: 110
Member No.: 96
Joined: 27-September 04



QUOTE (Alee79 @ Oct 28 2004, 02:50 PM)
100 octane? for real?
i use vortex from caltex all the time,because petrol card from work tongue.gif
cant complain laugh.gif

well, it's 'claimed' and we don't have any hard facts to prove it... my apologies, it's specifically named the 'vortex platinum' here, and also the most expensive... $1.61 per litre sad.gif


--------------------
user posted image
arist
Posted: Oct 29 2004, 08:27 AM


Soccer Mom


Group: Std. Member
Posts: 13
Member No.: 5
Joined: 5-August 04



I was talking to the owner of Turbo Vehicles ( there was some evidence of detonation) some time ago he and his company are well known in high performance vehicle circles and after dynoing my car he mentioned that the only Fuel that they had tested in NZ that had any Guts was Mobil 8000 , the rest were rubbish! ( i have no shares in Mobil!).

Ron
SenDog
Posted: Mar 11 2005, 02:06 AM


Custom


Group: VIP Member
Posts: 682
Member No.: 234
Joined: 16-February 05



I'm getting some relatively shockingly bad fuel economy, but then again I haven't calculated it yet, will do so from now on to see if it's just my imagination. I drive it normally, with a squirt now and then, and it seems to be chewing up petrol at an alarming rate. Could be I'm expecting it to be a super fuel efficient 2 litre. Will find out soon ....

Sport model, IS200.
aidan
Posted: Mar 21 2005, 05:55 PM


Soccer Mom


Group: Std. Member
Posts: 10
Member No.: 265
Joined: 21-March 05



I find BP Ultimate 98 is fine, also have you fitted an aftermarket air filter system- such as an HKS, K&N etc (Repco ones are no good!) I wouldnt really know about non-turbo 3SGE fuel economy as i have a 3S-GTE turbo MR2, hope this helps.
jasestu
Posted: Dec 8 2005, 05:31 PM


caffeinated...


Group: VIP Member
Posts: 1,392
Member No.: 90
Joined: 20-September 04



I've just put this post over on the UK forum to help up a poor Altezza owner who thinks NZ only has 91 and 96 octane fuel...

Hopefully he can find his way here for futher enlightenment. smile.gif

QUOTE
No no, we do have 98 RON in New Zealand - go to the New Zealand Altezza Forums and discuss there.  (Specifically, this thread)

98 is marketed by BP as "BP Ultimate" (link), Mobil has it as "Synergy 8000" (link).

Shell's "Ultra Hi" is 95 RON

Read more in this discussion paper.

And on the fuel company websites: www.shell.co.nz, www.mobil.co.nz, www.bp.co.nz

Does the RS200 Altezza's 11.5:1 compression ratio qualify as 'high'?  For what it's worth I run 98.


Edit: Maybe edwardch is already here? The original post on the UK forum was from back in June....

This post has been edited by jasestu on Dec 8 2005, 05:37 PM


--------------------
Nakamichi
Posted: Jan 23 2006, 03:03 PM


Stock


Group: Std. Member
Posts: 65
Member No.: 568
Joined: 19-January 06



At the time I bought my car a few months back the Lexus website shown that the fuel type for IS200 to be 91RON. The questions are :

1 - Does it mean that the ECU of the IS200 is set for 91RON and the continuous use of regular unlead will not cause any damage to the engine ?

2 - If that's the case, will the use of 95 or 98 octanes improve the performance or mileage ?

TIA


--------------------
user posted image

The Pursuit Of Audio Perfection
greeneyes
Posted: Feb 4 2006, 08:26 PM


Targa Master


Group: Admin
Posts: 5,166
Member No.: 1
Joined: 3-August 04



I am quite sure using 91 will not damage the engine.

The only difference the fuel rating makes is to the spark advance that the computer delivers.

If the fuel is low octane then the engine will detonate under load, the knock sensor will tell the ECU and the ECU will retard the timing and stop the pinking. This will reduce the power output, particularly over 3000rpm

So by upping the octane of the fuel you use you allow the engine to run more advance on the spark, and the engine revs better.

If you're not using all that power or all those revs, it doesn't matter which octane you use.

I use 96, occasionally 98 (especially trackday! laugh.gif ) and if petrol hits $2/litre next month then I'll mix 91 & 96!!!!!!


--------------------
Travelling the world, slowly...

http://z12.invisionfree.com/Dijos_travels/index.php?

Brian_J
Posted: Feb 4 2006, 09:55 PM


Sleeper


Group: VIP Member
Posts: 1,705
Member No.: 54
Joined: 18-August 04



apparently the computer on our computers are "learning" ones, so best to stick with one grade of fuel.

apparently 95 ron is the way to go for the GXE.

in reality though, i really dont think it makes much of a differnece, i usually go with 95 ron at shell or caltex. recently i have gone bp ultimax of 98 ron and notice very marginal improvements (maybe its all in my head though)


--------------------
2001 IS200 6MT
user posted image
Nakamichi
Posted: Feb 7 2006, 09:14 AM


Stock


Group: Std. Member
Posts: 65
Member No.: 568
Joined: 19-January 06



I've tried all three RON from Caltex but did not seem to find any different for rev up to 6000rpm as that's the most I went. I made very sure that each tank was filled up without much mix of the other, ie at least 67 litres of each RON was filled at a time. The feeling of 91RON seems to be more smoother & softer on the accelerator wink.gif Try to tell the difference yourself by asking someone to randomly fill up one type of the RON next time, so don't try to guess it if you can not tell the difference w00t.gif


--------------------
user posted image

The Pursuit Of Audio Perfection
SenDog
Posted: Feb 12 2006, 03:26 AM


Custom


Group: VIP Member
Posts: 682
Member No.: 234
Joined: 16-February 05



I've tried regular as well as Optimax / 8000 / Ultimate and haven't noticed any difference. What I did notice was fuel economy improved markedly when revs are between 3000-4000 instead of 2500-3500 during normal driving.
jasestu
Posted: Feb 13 2006, 05:55 AM


caffeinated...


Group: VIP Member
Posts: 1,392
Member No.: 90
Joined: 20-September 04



Drive above 3000?! Sweet, that's all the excuse I need.. 5th gear on the open road... 6th and I'll have to go 130-140 to be economic? Gunna love explaining that to the enforcers... wink.gif


--------------------
SenDog
Posted: Feb 13 2006, 10:04 AM


Custom


Group: VIP Member
Posts: 682
Member No.: 234
Joined: 16-February 05



I believe it's more to do with the throttle position, light throttle on these un-torquey engines at a slightly higher rpm would be more fuel efficient than heavier throttle at a lower rpm.
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Engines | Intakes | Exhausts | Next Newest »


Topic OptionsPages: (4) [1] 2 3 ... Last »



Hosted for free by InvisionFree (Terms of Use: Updated 7/7/05) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Archive